GRE寫作要避開論證片面才能拿高分。在備考GRE的過程中,，很多考生常常會遇到寫作部分的挑戰(zhàn),。為了幫助大家提高GRE寫作的成績，本文將分享一些避免片面論證的方法,。

Understand the Task

The GRE writing task requires you to discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with a given statement. The key is to explore both sides of the argument, rather than taking a one-sided approach. This means considering how the statement might hold true in some contexts and not in others.

Balance Perspectives

When faced with statements that present opposing views, it’s essential to find common ground. For instance, if the prompt states, "It is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value." you can argue:

• The artwork itself has intrinsic value, while critics help elucidate that value for society.
• Many timeless works of art are recognized and preserved thanks to the efforts of critics.

Thus, both artists and critics play vital roles, and their contributions are not mutually exclusive.

Separate Key Concepts

Some prompts may introduce two concepts that appear aligned but differ significantly. In such cases, affirm one concept while refuting the other. For example, consider the statement, "Technologies not only influence but actually determine social customs and ethics." Here, we can differentiate:

• Affirming customs: Technologies can indeed alter customs, such as rituals and traditions evolving due to scientific advancements.
• Refuting ethics: Ethics, however, are deeply rooted and resistant to change, as they reflect fundamental human values established over centuries.

Define Ambiguous Terms

Many prompts contain ambiguous terms that can be interpreted in various ways. By defining these terms differently, you can approach the argument from multiple angles. For instance, take the statement, "Facts are stubborn things. They cannot be altered by our wishes, or our inclinations." The term "facts" can be understood as:

• If defined as natural laws, such as mortality, they remain unchangeable regardless of our desires.
• If viewed as historical records, then facts may be subject to interpretation and alteration, as history is often influenced by perspective.

以上就是我們?yōu)镚RE考生整理的關(guān)于如何避免片面論證的方法,。通過多角度分析、平衡觀點,、定義模糊關(guān)鍵詞等策略,，考生可以在GRE寫作中展現(xiàn)出更高的復(fù)雜性和深度，從而取得理想的成績,。希望大家在備考中能夠靈活運用這些技巧,，順利通過GRE寫作考試！

對于許多考生來說,，GRE寫作部分可能是最具挑戰(zhàn)性的環(huán)節(jié)之一,。為了幫助你在這一部分取得高分,，以下是一些實用的技巧和策略，幫助你提高寫作能力,，獲得更高的分數(shù),。??

1. 理解題目要求

Read the prompt carefully: 在開始寫作之前，確保你完全理解了題目的要求,。GRE寫作通常分為兩個部分：Analyze an Issue 和 Analyze an Argument. 這兩種題型需要不同的思維方式和寫作風(fēng)格,。

2. 制定清晰的結(jié)構(gòu)

Outline your essay: 在動筆之前，花幾分鐘時間制定一個清晰的結(jié)構(gòu),。一個典型的GRE寫作結(jié)構(gòu)包括：

• 引言段：介紹你的論點或立場,。
• 主體段落：支持你的觀點，提供例證和理由,。
• 反駁段落：考慮對立觀點,，并解釋為什么你的觀點更有說服力。
• 結(jié)論段：總結(jié)主要觀點,，并重申你的立場,。

這樣的結(jié)構(gòu)可以幫助你理順思路，提高文章的邏輯性,。??

3. 多用例證

Support your arguments: 在寫作時,，使用具體的例證來支持你的觀點。這可以是個人經(jīng)歷,、歷史事件或社會現(xiàn)象,。通過具體的例證，你的論點會顯得更加有說服力,。

例如,，如果題目是 “Do we rely too much on technology?” ，你可以引用某個研究表明過度依賴技術(shù)導(dǎo)致人際關(guān)系疏遠的現(xiàn)象,。??

4. 注意語言表達

Use varied vocabulary and sentence structures: 在寫作中,，盡量使用豐富的詞匯和多樣的句子結(jié)構(gòu)。這不僅可以使你的文章更加生動,，也能展示你的語言能力,。

例如，替換常見的詞匯,，如將“important”替換為“crucial”或“significant”,。同時，避免重復(fù)相同的句式,，嘗試不同的開頭方式,。???

5. 時間管理

Practice timing: GRE寫作的時間限制是30分鐘，因此在練習(xí)時一定要掌握好時間,。你可以設(shè)置定時器,，在規(guī)定時間內(nèi)完成一篇文章,，以提高你的寫作速度和效率。

建議分配時間：前5分鐘構(gòu)思,，接下來的20分鐘寫作,，最后5分鐘進行修改和校對。?

6. 反復(fù)練習(xí)與反饋

Seek feedback: 寫作是一個不斷改進的過程,。找老師或同學(xué)幫你批改作文,，聽取他們的意見和建議。同時,，多閱讀高分范文,，學(xué)習(xí)他們的寫作技巧和思路。

例如,，參考一些高分范文,，如 “The impact of social media on communication”，分析其結(jié)構(gòu)和論證方式,。??

7. 保持積極心態(tài)

Stay positive: 考試前保持良好的心態(tài)非常重要,。相信自己的能力，保持冷靜,，可以幫助你在考試中發(fā)揮出最佳水平。??

通過以上技巧的練習(xí)和運用,，相信你能夠在GRE寫作部分取得理想的成績,。加油！??

Preparing for the GRE's Analytical Writing section can be a daunting task, but with the right strategies and practice, you can excel. This article is tailored for GRE candidates looking to enhance their writing skills, particularly in the Argument Analysis task. ??

Understanding the Argument Analysis Task

The Argument Analysis task requires you to critically evaluate an argument presented in a short passage. Your goal is to identify the argument's assumptions, evidence, and logical flaws. Here's a typical prompt you might encounter:

“The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper: ‘The city should invest in building more parks because studies show that people who live near parks are generally healthier than those who do not.’”

Key Components to Focus On

When writing your response, focus on these components:

• Identify Assumptions: What underlying beliefs does the argument rely on? For example, the argument assumes that proximity to parks is the only factor influencing health.
• Evaluate Evidence: Is the evidence provided sufficient? In our example, the argument lacks specific data linking park access to improved health outcomes.
• Highlight Logical Fallacies: Are there any gaps in reasoning? Perhaps the argument overlooks other factors affecting health, such as diet or socioeconomic status.

Structuring Your Response

A well-structured response typically includes:

• Introduction: Briefly summarize the argument and state your thesis regarding its validity.
• Body Paragraphs: Discuss each flaw or assumption in detail, providing examples and reasoning.
• Conclusion: Summarize your analysis and suggest ways to strengthen the argument.

Practice Makes Perfect ??

Regular practice is essential for mastering the Argument Analysis task. Here are some tips:

• Use Official Prompts: Practice with prompts from the ETS website to familiarize yourself with the format.
• Time Yourself: Simulate test conditions by writing responses within the 30-minute time limit.
• Seek Feedback: Share your essays with peers or instructors to gain insights and improve your writing.

Sample Response ??

Here’s a brief example of how to structure your response to the prompt provided earlier:

In the argument presented, the author claims that the city should invest in building more parks based on the assertion that proximity to parks correlates with better health. However, this argument is flawed due to several unexamined assumptions. First, it assumes that living near parks is the sole determinant of health, ignoring other factors such as lifestyle choices and income levels. Furthermore, the argument fails to provide specific evidence or studies that support the claim, making it difficult to assess the validity of the conclusion. To strengthen the argument, the author should include empirical data demonstrating a direct link between park access and health benefits, as well as consider other contributing factors to public health.”

Final Thoughts ??

As you prepare for the GRE, remember that the Analytical Writing section is an opportunity to showcase your critical thinking and writing abilities. By understanding the structure of the Argument Analysis task, practicing regularly, and seeking feedback, you can improve your performance. Stay focused, and best of luck on your GRE journey!

對于準備GRE的考生來說,，寫作部分常常被低估,。許多人認為只要在閱讀和數(shù)學(xué)上表現(xiàn)良好，就能順利通過,。然而,，GRE寫作部分同樣重要，它不僅考察你的英語表達能力,，還反映了你的邏輯思維和分析能力,。為了幫助大家更好地備戰(zhàn)，我們將探討一些常見的誤區(qū),，并提供實用的建議,。??

誤區(qū)一：忽視結(jié)構(gòu)

很多考生在寫作時往往忽略了文章的結(jié)構(gòu)。他們可能會直接開始寫,，而沒有清晰的開頭,、主體和結(jié)尾。一個良好的結(jié)構(gòu)能夠使你的論點更加清晰,，邏輯更加嚴密,。建議考生在開頭段落中明確表述你的觀點,，然后在主體段落中逐步展開論證，最后在結(jié)尾段落中總結(jié)你的觀點,。

誤區(qū)二：缺乏具體例證

在GRE寫作中,，單純的觀點陳述是不夠的,?？忌枰ㄟ^具體的例證來支持自己的論點。例如,，如果你在討論“Technology improves communication”,，可以引用“Social Media connects people across the globe”這樣的具體例子,。這樣不僅增強了說服力，還能展示你的分析能力,。??

誤區(qū)三：詞匯使用不當

許多考生在寫作時過于追求復(fù)雜的詞匯,，結(jié)果導(dǎo)致表達不清。雖然使用豐富的詞匯是必要的,，但更重要的是要確保你的表達簡潔明了,。避免使用生僻詞匯或拼寫錯誤，這些都會影響評分,。記住,，清晰的表達總是優(yōu)于華麗的辭藻。??

誤區(qū)四：時間管理不善

GRE寫作部分的時間有限,，考生必須合理分配時間,。在準備階段，建議進行模擬寫作練習(xí),，設(shè)定時間限制,，以培養(yǎng)時間意識。通常,，建議將時間分配為：20分鐘構(gòu)思和計劃,，30分鐘寫作，10分鐘修改,。這樣可以確保你的文章既有深度又有質(zhì)量,。

誤區(qū)五：忽視修改

很多考生在完成寫作后，往往急于提交,，而忽視了最后的修改步驟,。即使是在時間緊迫的情況下，花幾分鐘檢查語法,、拼寫和邏輯錯誤也是非常必要的,。修改不僅能提高文章的整體質(zhì)量，還能避免一些低級錯誤，提升你的得分,。??

范文示例

題目：Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement: “Technology has made communication easier, but it has also made it less personal.”

參考答案：While technology indeed facilitates communication through instant messaging and social media, it often sacrifices the personal touch that face-to-face interactions offer. For instance, a text message lacks the emotional nuance of a spoken conversation, leading to misunderstandings. Therefore, I believe that while technology has its advantages, it ultimately diminishes the personal aspect of communication.

新題預(yù)測

在接下來的GRE考試中,，可能會出現(xiàn)以下話題：

• Discuss the impact of artificial intelligence on job markets.
• To what extent do you agree that education should focus more on practical skills than theoretical knowledge?

通過了解這些常見誤區(qū)并采取相應(yīng)的對策，考生可以更有效地提升自己的寫作能力,。在備考過程中,，保持積極的心態(tài)和持續(xù)的練習(xí)，將有助于你在GRE寫作中取得理想的成績,。??