最新GRE ARGUMENT作文題之高速公路安全，給廣大考生提供了一個重要的寫作練習(xí)機會。本文將為您分析該題目的重點，幫助您在GRE考試中取得優(yōu)異的成績,。

Daily Practice

In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. However, this initiative has not yielded the desired results: the number of accidents has not decreased, and reports from the highway patrol indicate that many drivers are still exceeding the speed limit. Instead, Prunty County should consider implementing road improvement projects similar to those completed by Butler County five years ago, which included widening lanes, resurfacing rough roads, and enhancing visibility at hazardous intersections. Despite maintaining a 55 mph speed limit, Butler County experienced a 25 percent reduction in reported accidents this past year compared to five years ago.

Task Requirements

Write a response discussing what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would either weaken or strengthen it.

Task Translation

To enhance highway safety, Prunty County recently reduced the speed limit on all major roads from 55 mph to 45 mph. However, we should revert to the original speed limit of 55 mph, as this safety measure has proven ineffective. Many drivers exceed the new limit, and the accident rate in Prunty County has only slightly decreased. To improve highway safety, we should adopt the same road improvement strategies that Butler County implemented five years ago, such as increasing lane widths and resurfacing uneven roads. Currently, Butler County's main roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet the reported accident rate has decreased by 25% over recent years.

Analysis of the Argument

1. The author fails to provide sufficient information to demonstrate that the speed limit reduction in Prunty County was unsuccessful, particularly given the short time frame since the implementation.

2. Furthermore, there is inadequate evidence to support the claim that Butler County's policies were successful; the 25% statistic may not accurately reflect causation. Even if there was a reduction, it does not necessarily imply that road improvements were the reason.

3. The author overlooks other factors: first, whether Butler County's circumstances are comparable to those of Prunty County; second, the financial implications of road widening and resurfacing in Butler County.

Outline Sharing

1. The prevalence of speeding does not automatically indicate a failure of the speed limit; it is essential to examine whether the average speed has decreased compared to before. Returning to 55 mph may not be the only option.

2. Reporting accuracy can vary based on media interests.

3. A.B.S. (Automated Braking Systems) may contribute to a decrease in accidents.

4. Sample differences must be considered.

After thoroughly reviewing the prompt, I commend all test-takers for their dedication. Conquering the GRE is within your reach! May every candidate prepare adequately before the exam and achieve their desired scores!

最新GRE ARGUMENT作文題之高速公路安全，期待每位考生在未來的考試中能夠發(fā)揮出色,，取得理想的成績,！

Preparing for the GRE can be a daunting task, especially when it comes to the Argument section. One common topic that appears in this section is related to highway safety. Understanding how to analyze and critique arguments about highway safety can greatly enhance your performance. ???

Sample Prompt: "The following appeared in a memorandum from the director of the Highway Safety Administration: 'To improve highway safety, we should implement stricter speed limits on all highways. Studies show that lower speed limits reduce the number of accidents and fatalities. Therefore, enforcing these limits will lead to safer roads for everyone.'"

When you encounter such a prompt, your goal is to evaluate the reasoning behind the argument presented. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Identify the Assumptions: The argument relies on several assumptions, such as the belief that lower speed limits directly correlate with fewer accidents. However, it fails to consider other factors that may contribute to highway safety, such as driver behavior, road conditions, and vehicle safety features. ???

2. Analyze the Evidence: The claim states that studies show lower speed limits reduce accidents. It's essential to question the quality and relevance of these studies. Were they conducted in various environments? Did they account for other variables? If the evidence is weak or limited, the argument becomes less convincing.

3. Consider Counterarguments: Think about potential counterarguments. For example, could there be situations where lower speed limits might lead to increased congestion, thereby causing more accidents? What about the impact on emergency services that rely on highways for quick response times? Considering alternative viewpoints strengthens your critique. ??

4. Conclusion on Effectiveness: Finally, assess whether implementing stricter speed limits alone would effectively enhance highway safety. It may be beneficial to suggest additional measures, such as improved driver education programs or better enforcement of existing traffic laws, to provide a more comprehensive solution. ??

Sample Answer Structure:

• Introduction: Briefly restate the argument and your thesis on its validity.
• Body Paragraphs: Each paragraph should tackle one aspect of the argument – assumptions, evidence, counterarguments, and suggestions for improvement.
• Conclusion: Summarize your main points and reiterate your stance on the argument's effectiveness.

As you prepare for the GRE, practice writing responses to various prompts. Here’s a new topic to try:

New Prompt: "The city council has proposed increasing taxes on gasoline to fund public transportation improvements. They argue that this will encourage more people to use public transit, reducing traffic congestion and pollution."

Predicted Key Points for Analysis:

• Assumptions about the correlation between gasoline taxes and public transit usage.
• The effectiveness of public transportation improvements in attracting users.
• Consideration of the economic impact on individuals who rely on their vehicles.

In conclusion, practicing your analytical skills is crucial for mastering the GRE Argument section. By breaking down arguments, questioning assumptions, and considering multiple perspectives, you’ll be well-prepared for any topic that comes your way. Good luck! ????

As a GRE test taker, mastering the Argument essay is crucial for achieving a competitive score. One common topic that may arise is related to highway safety. In this article, I will share insights and strategies for effectively tackling such prompts, along with a sample argument to illustrate my points. ????

Understanding the Prompt

When you encounter a prompt like: "The following appeared in a memo from the director of a highway safety organization: 'In order to reduce traffic accidents on highways, we should increase the number of highway patrol officers and install more surveillance cameras along the roads.' Discuss how well-reasoned you find this argument." it’s essential to break down the components of the argument.

Identifying Flaws

First, identify any assumptions made in the argument. The director assumes that increasing the number of patrol officers and surveillance cameras will directly lead to a reduction in traffic accidents. However, there are several factors that could influence the effectiveness of these measures:

• Driver Behavior: The argument does not consider whether increased police presence or cameras will change reckless driving behaviors. ??
• Accident Causes: Traffic accidents can occur due to various reasons, such as poor road conditions or weather. The memo overlooks these factors.
• Resource Allocation: The proposal does not discuss the budget implications of hiring more officers and installing cameras. Will this funding come at the expense of other vital safety programs?

Structuring Your Response

When writing your essay, structure is key. Start with an introduction that summarizes the argument and states your thesis. For example:

"While the director's proposal aims to enhance highway safety, it overlooks critical factors that could undermine its effectiveness, such as driver behavior and resource allocation."

Next, dedicate body paragraphs to discussing each flaw you've identified. Use evidence and reasoning to support your claims. For instance, you might write:

Body Paragraph Example:

"Firstly, the assumption that increasing the number of highway patrol officers will deter reckless driving is questionable. Studies have shown that while visible law enforcement can reduce speeding, it may not significantly impact other dangerous behaviors like distracted driving."

Concluding Effectively

In your conclusion, summarize your main points and suggest ways the argument could be strengthened. You might say:

"To improve highway safety, the director should consider a comprehensive approach that includes education on safe driving practices, better road maintenance, and community engagement, rather than solely relying on increased surveillance."

Practice Makes Perfect

To prepare for the GRE Argument essay, practice with various prompts. Here’s a new sample prompt to try:

"The following appeared in a letter to the editor: 'The city council should invest in public transportation to reduce traffic congestion. Studies show that cities with robust public transport systems experience fewer traffic issues.'"

Analyze the assumptions, structure your response, and critique the argument just as you would with the highway safety topic.

Final Tips

As you prepare for the GRE, remember the following tips:

• Time management is crucial; allocate around 30 minutes for planning and writing your essay.
• Use clear and concise language to express your ideas effectively.
• Proofread your work to catch any grammatical errors or unclear phrasing before submission. ??

By practicing these strategies and engaging with a variety of prompts, you’ll build the skills necessary to approach the GRE Argument essay with confidence. Good luck! ??