在GRE考試中,，寫作部分包括兩篇主要的作文：ISSUE和ARGUMENT。了解這兩種作文的特點(diǎn)和要求對(duì)于考生來說至關(guān)重要,。本文將為考生提供一些實(shí)用的高分策略，幫助大家在這兩篇作文中都能取得理想的成績(jī),。

一,、兩篇作文的具體要求

1. 寫作要求

ISSUE作文要求考生根據(jù)給定的話題闡述自己的觀點(diǎn)，相當(dāng)于中文中的立論文,。而ARGUMENT則是駁論性質(zhì)的,，考生需要對(duì)給出的論點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析和反駁，找出其中的邏輯漏洞,。

2. 寫作難度

對(duì)于許多中國(guó)考生而言,，撰寫ISSUE作文的挑戰(zhàn)相對(duì)較大，因?yàn)樗罂忌?dú)立思考并提出自己的觀點(diǎn),。而ARGUMENT作文相對(duì)簡(jiǎn)單,，考生只需識(shí)別并攻擊論點(diǎn)中的缺陷。

3. 復(fù)習(xí)時(shí)間

由于ISSUE作文需要考生具備較強(qiáng)的創(chuàng)造力,，因此復(fù)習(xí)時(shí)間通常更長(zhǎng),?？忌鷳?yīng)重點(diǎn)準(zhǔn)備作文模板，并練習(xí)快速構(gòu)思提綱,。而ARGUMENT作文的復(fù)習(xí)時(shí)間較短,，考生可以更多地關(guān)注如何識(shí)別邏輯漏洞及其寫作技巧。

二,、兩篇作文的相同點(diǎn)

雖然ISSUE和ARGUMENT作文存在許多不同之處,，但它們也有一些共同點(diǎn)：

1. 基本要求

兩篇作文的考試時(shí)間均為30分鐘，且都屬于議論文風(fēng)格,。盡管沒有字?jǐn)?shù)限制,，建議字?jǐn)?shù)控制在400-500字之間，以確保文章的完整性,。

2. 評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)

兩篇作文的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相同,，滿分為6分，最終得分為兩篇作文分?jǐn)?shù)的平均值,。評(píng)分主要依據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu),、邏輯思維、語言運(yùn)用及論據(jù)使用等方面,。

3. 復(fù)習(xí)資源

無論是ISSUE還是ARGUMENT,，考生都可以利用ETS官方的題庫、高分范文以及相關(guān)的詞匯和論據(jù)素材來進(jìn)行復(fù)習(xí),。

三,、高分策略分享

那么，考生在面對(duì)這兩篇作文時(shí),，如何確保獲得高分呢,？

1. 重視兩篇作文

考生不應(yīng)忽視任何一篇作文，因?yàn)樽罱K的成績(jī)?nèi)Q于兩者的平均分,。確保每篇作文的基礎(chǔ)分?jǐn)?shù)都是關(guān)鍵,。

2. 根據(jù)特點(diǎn)制定策略

鑒于中國(guó)考生通常在ISSUE方面較弱，而在ARGUMENT方面表現(xiàn)較強(qiáng),，建議考生在ISSUE上爭(zhēng)取達(dá)到3.5到4分,，而在ARGUMENT上努力爭(zhēng)取4.5分甚至5分。這樣可以有效提升整體作文分?jǐn)?shù),。

綜上所述,，GRE考生在沖刺作文高分時(shí)，應(yīng)充分理解ISSUE與ARGUMENT的異同,，并采取合理的備考策略,。希望以上內(nèi)容能夠?yàn)榇蠹业膶懽魈峁?shí)質(zhì)性的幫助，助力你們?cè)贕RE寫作中取得優(yōu)異成績(jī),！

GRE寫作高分技巧分享

對(duì)于許多GRE考生來說,，寫作部分可能是最具挑戰(zhàn)性的環(huán)節(jié)之一。為了幫助大家在這一部分取得高分,，我總結(jié)了一些實(shí)用的技巧和經(jīng)驗(yàn),，希望能為你的備考提供幫助。??

1. 理解題目類型

GRE寫作主要有兩個(gè)部分：Analyze an Argument 和 Analyze an Issue,。了解這兩種題型的要求是成功的第一步,。

• Analyze an Argument: 你需要分析一個(gè)論點(diǎn)的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)，找出其漏洞和不合理之處,。
• Analyze an Issue: 你需要對(duì)一個(gè)給定的主題表達(dá)自己的觀點(diǎn),，并進(jìn)行論證。

2. 制定清晰的結(jié)構(gòu)

無論是哪種題型,，清晰的結(jié)構(gòu)都是至關(guān)重要的,。通常情況下，可以遵循以下格式：

• 引言: 簡(jiǎn)要介紹話題并提出你的立場(chǎng),。
• 主體段落: 每個(gè)段落圍繞一個(gè)中心思想展開,，提供支持性論據(jù)。
• 結(jié)論: 總結(jié)你的觀點(diǎn),，并重申其重要性,。

3. 使用豐富的詞匯

在寫作中使用多樣化的詞匯可以提高文章的質(zhì)量。嘗試使用一些學(xué)術(shù)性詞匯和短語,，例如：

• Moreover: 此外
• Consequently: 因此
• Nonetheless: 盡管如此

例如,，在討論某個(gè)論點(diǎn)時(shí)，你可以寫道：“Moreover, the evidence presented fails to consider alternative explanations.” 這樣的用法會(huì)讓你的文章更加引人注目,。??

4. 練習(xí)時(shí)間管理

在GRE寫作中,，時(shí)間管理非常重要。建議按照以下步驟進(jìn)行練習(xí)：

• 首先,，花5分鐘理解題目和構(gòu)思大綱,。
• 接下來，花25分鐘寫作,。
• 最后,，留出5分鐘進(jìn)行修改和校對(duì)。

這種方法可以確保你在考試中不會(huì)因?yàn)闀r(shí)間不足而影響寫作質(zhì)量,。?

5. 多讀范文

閱讀高分范文可以幫助你了解優(yōu)秀寫作的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和技巧,。以下是一些推薦的范文題目：

• “Do we have a responsibility to protect the environment?”
• “The best way to increase happiness is to spend money on experiences rather than material goods.”

通過分析這些范文，你可以學(xué)習(xí)到如何構(gòu)建論點(diǎn),、使用例證以及如何有效地組織文章結(jié)構(gòu),。

6. 定期進(jìn)行模擬寫作

定期進(jìn)行模擬寫作練習(xí)可以幫助你提高寫作速度和流暢度。你可以選擇一些新的題目進(jìn)行練習(xí),，以下是一些預(yù)測(cè)題目供參考：

• “Technology has made communication easier but less personal.”
• “Should education focus more on practical skills than theoretical knowledge?”

每周至少進(jìn)行一次完整的寫作練習(xí),，逐漸提高你的寫作能力,。??

7. 尋求反饋

向老師或同學(xué)尋求反饋可以幫助你發(fā)現(xiàn)自己的不足之處。請(qǐng)他們關(guān)注你的邏輯,、結(jié)構(gòu)和語言使用,，通過他人的視角來改進(jìn)自己的寫作水平。

希望以上技巧能夠幫助你在GRE寫作中取得理想的成績(jī),！記住,，持續(xù)的練習(xí)和反思是提升寫作能力的關(guān)鍵。祝你好運(yùn),！??

Preparing for the GRE can be a daunting task, especially when it comes to the writing section. One of the key components of this section is the GRE Issue Argument task. In this article, we will explore some effective strategies and provide a sample essay to help you understand how to approach this task successfully. ??

Understanding the GRE Issue Argument Task

The GRE Issue Argument task requires you to analyze an argument presented in a short passage. Your goal is to critique the reasoning behind the argument, identify any flaws, and suggest ways to strengthen it. This task is not about expressing your personal opinion on the topic; rather, it’s about evaluating the argument's logic and evidence. ??

Sample Argument Prompt

Consider the following argument:

"The city council should allocate more funds to public transportation. Increased investment in public transit will reduce traffic congestion and pollution, leading to a healthier environment for residents."

Sample Essay Structure

When crafting your response, consider the following structure:

1. Introduction: Briefly summarize the argument and state your thesis regarding its strengths and weaknesses.
2. Body Paragraphs: Discuss specific flaws in the argument, supported by examples and reasoning.
3. Counterarguments: Acknowledge potential counterarguments and explain why they do not sufficiently support the original argument.
4. Conclusion: Summarize your main points and suggest ways to improve the argument.

Sample Essay

The argument that the city council should allocate more funds to public transportation is based on the assumption that increased investment will lead to reduced traffic congestion and pollution. While this may seem logical at first glance, there are several flaws in the reasoning that undermine the argument.

First, the argument fails to provide evidence that increased funding will indeed result in improved public transportation services. For instance, past investments in public transit may not have led to significant improvements in service quality or ridership. Without data supporting the effectiveness of previous funding, the council cannot assume that more money will yield better results. ??

Second, the argument overlooks other potential solutions to traffic congestion and pollution. For example, encouraging carpooling, promoting cycling, or investing in pedestrian infrastructure could also alleviate these issues. By focusing solely on public transportation, the city council may miss out on a more comprehensive approach to urban mobility. ???♂?

Additionally, the argument does not address the potential costs associated with increased funding. Allocating more funds to public transportation might require cuts to other essential services, such as education or healthcare. The argument lacks a discussion of the trade-offs involved in reallocating city resources, which is crucial for a well-rounded analysis. ??

Finally, while the argument suggests that improved public transportation will lead to a healthier environment, it does not provide any evidence linking these two factors. For example, it could be argued that simply increasing the number of buses or trains does not guarantee that people will choose to use them over their cars. Surveys or studies demonstrating a correlation between improved public transport and reduced pollution would strengthen the argument significantly.

In conclusion, while the idea of investing in public transportation is commendable, the argument presented lacks sufficient evidence and fails to consider alternative solutions. To enhance the argument, the city council should provide data supporting the effectiveness of previous investments, explore a range of strategies to tackle congestion and pollution, and discuss the potential implications of reallocating city funds. By addressing these issues, the council can make a more compelling case for increased investment in public transit. ??

Tips for Success

As you prepare for the GRE Issue Argument task, keep the following tips in mind:

• Practice analyzing various arguments to sharpen your critical thinking skills.
• Time yourself to simulate test conditions and improve your writing speed.
• Review sample essays to understand what constitutes a strong argument critique.
• Familiarize yourself with common logical fallacies to identify weaknesses in arguments quickly.

By following these strategies and utilizing the sample provided, you will be well on your way to mastering the GRE Issue Argument task. Best of luck with your preparation! ??